Counterspeech on Twitter

The Dangerous Speech Project collaborated with data scientists at McGill University to study hateful speech on Twitter and seek out instances of successful “counterspeech” – responses to hatred that appear to have caused the original speaker to retract their statement, apologize, and/or delete the offensive tweet. This research, supported by Public Safety Canada’s Kanishka Project, resulted in two reports – “Counterspeech on Twitter: A Field Study” and “Considerations for Successful Counterspeech” – and we are exploring opportunities to continue this line of research.

Dangerous speech and the 2016 presidential election

The Dangerous Speech Project has identified instances where Donald Trump and other prominent political leaders have used hallmarks of dangerous speech, and has also called on Mr. Trump to denounce violence being done in his name. The Southern Poverty Law Center released a report in late November 2016 summarizing nearly 900 incidents of harassment and intimidation reported in the aftermath of Trump’s election, in many cases specifically invoking Trump’s name during the attacks. We are continuing to monitor the situation closely and are collaborating with various partners to determine the most effective strategy to counter violence and hatred in the United States.

Related Resources

OP-ED: Israel Can – and Must – Fight Hamas Without Starving Gazan Civilians to Death
Susan Benesch at SOTN 2024
OP ED: Many Americans believe migrants bring fentanyl across the border. That’s wrong and dangerous
EVENT | Counterspeech: Countering online hate in the 2024 elections
The center isn’t holding: the Israel-Hamas war crushes moderate discourse
Prevent Violence, Strengthen Democracy: Electoral Codes of Conduct for the United States
What is Dangerous Speech? [Video]